Myths vs. Facts
Animal Research: Perception vs. Reality
Misinformation can cloud the truth about animal research. This section breaks down common misconceptions and replaces them with evidence-based facts — helping you understand how ethical, regulated animal studies truly support science, safety, and compassion.
Right now, there is no comprehensive substitute for animal testing and research. Certainly, computer models and cell cultures, as well as other adjunct research methods, reduce the number of animals used. But there is no way to completely replace animal testing and research because the pathway to fully duplicating a whole, living system does not yet exist. Cell cultures and computers are limited in what they can model.
About 95 percent of all lab animals in medical research are rats and mice bred specifically for the research. Some animal testing and research involves non-human primates, dogs, cats and pigs because they are the best models of certain diseases. Less than one half of one percent of animal research is conducted with these animals. Most animal testing and research is conducted with rats and mice that are bred specifically for research.
Lab animals are bred specifically for research. There is absolutely no evidence to support the claim that dogs and cats are taken from homes and shelters and sold to laboratories. In fact, scientists neither need nor want to conduct research with pets.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has set forth federal regulations governing the care and use of animals in biomedical research that are considered more extensive than those covering human research subjects. In the U.S., the Animal Welfare Act sets high standards of care for research animals with regard to their housing, feeding, cleanliness, ventilation, medical needs, enrichment, and socialization. It also requires the use of anesthesia or analgesic drugs for potentially painful procedures and during post- operative care. The U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) Act requires that all institutions receiving research funds from the National Institutes of Health, the Food and Drug Administration, or the Centers for Disease Control adhere to the standards set out in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Under the PHS policy, institutions must follow detailed animal care recommendations and establish an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) to ensure that all animals are treated responsibly and humanely. Most importantly, research institutions are required — by law — to establish an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) to oversee their work with animals. IACUCs require researchers to justify their need for animals, select the most appropriate species, and study the fewest number of animals possible to answer a specific question.
No one is in favor of inhumane or irresponsible treatment of lab animals. Further, poor care results in unreliable research data. For results to be valid, animal subjects must be in good condition and appropriately healthy. Also, pain and distress are thought to have a negative impact on the immune system so researchers are careful to protect their animals from undue stress.
Promising medical treatments are on the horizon, thanks to the tremendous capabilities of stem cells, but stem cell treatments must first demonstrate safety and efficacy in animal models before they can be introduced in humans.
With the recent sequencing of genomes, in-depth research into animal physiology, and surgical advances, researchers are constantly being reminded that humans share many biological and physiological characteristics with animals. Practically all biomedical research with lab animals advances veterinary medicine as well as human medicine and helps pets and wildlife live longer, happier, and healthier lives. Dozens of diseases, from cancer to epilepsy, affect both animals and humans. Vaccines that treat humans benefit animals. Many other conditions are successfully treated, in both humans and animals, with antibiotics. Through research with animals these diseases and disorders are becoming more manageable and less fatal.
There’s a common myth that advances in artificial intelligence can eliminate the need for animal testing in pharmaceutical development. While AI is powerful, it relies on existing data. The reality is: Human and animal biological systems are incredibly complex, and much about how these systems work remains unknown.
Animal research is essential for testing new pharmaceutical products, as it provides crucial insights into how drugs interact with living organisms. This process typically involves at least one rodent and one non-rodent model and helps ensure a drug's safety and effectiveness before it reaches human clinical trials. Animal models are equally important in developing treatments for animal health, as they help ensure new veterinary medicines are safe and effective for the animals they are designed to treat. AI can assist and is a useful adjunct to animal research, but it cannot fully replicate or replace the biological responses that animals provide in the drug development process.
Gene-based therapies for cancer and autoimmune disease, treatments for neurological and neurodegenerative diseases, and other burgeoning areas of biomedical research can only advance if scientists are properly equipped. Developing a new drug can take 10 to 15 years, and animals play a critical role in that stepwise process. AI is a valuable tool, but for the foreseeable future, animal testing remains vital to advancing treatments for human and animal health.

Explore the Facts Behind the Debate
Animal Research: Perceptions vs. Reality
Misconceptions about animal research are widespread — but facts tell a different story. Our interactive flipbook breaks down common myths and contrasts them with the realities of ethical, regulated animal research that contributes to lifesaving medical progress.
